Removing the signs and booths and then replacing them with cameras and digital systems eliminated any safeguards to avoid inadvertent tolls and subsequent violations, plaintiffs claim.įurthermore, the lawsuit claimed that cashless tolls assume everyone has a computer and understands “vague and confusing roadside signage.” This is in reference to signs with an internet URL that motorist can access to pay tolls. Plaintiffs argued that when toll roads used manned and unmanned toll booths, motorists were adequately warned with conspicuous signs and with the toll booths themselves.
#91 freeway express fines drivers
According to the lawsuit, the switch to cashless tolls unfairly penalized unsuspecting drivers who did not have FasTrak passes or ExpressAccounts. Beginning in May 2014, those toll booths were converted to all-electronic cashless tolls. The board would take tax refunds and lottery winnings from drivers with outstanding Southern California toll bills.Ĭalifornia Highways 73, 91, 133, 241 and 261 have collected tolls at toll booths since 1995.
#91 freeway express fines registration
Plaintiffs claim the toll operators gave information to the DMV, allowing the agency to deny vehicle registration renewals for drivers with an outstanding toll bill.Īdditionally, information was given to the California Franchise Tax Board. Class members also allege that toll agencies levied excessive fines and violated due process.Īt the heart of the case is the Southern California toll agencies’ coordination with the California Department of Motor Vehicles. California state law prohibits such distribution of personal information. 16, 2016, the class action lawsuit accuses the toll operators of improperly providing personally identifiable information of toll road users to dozens of third parties. Allegations of privacy law violations and manipulation According to Judge Wright, the $100 maximum does not violate the Eighth and 14th amendments of the U.S. Furthermore, the Orange County toll operator can keep its maximum toll violation penalty at $100. According to the class action judgment, the court finds that the Orange County Transportation Authority did not violate any state laws. Express lanes are optional travel lanes, located on an interstate or toll road, that customers can choose to use when they want a more predictable travel. The Orange County settlement absolves the Southern California toll agency of wrongdoing.
0 kommentar(er)
